We have noted a multiplication of fraud attempts in which the name ODDO BHF is likely to be used. This is particularly the case for Portuguese-language websites that usurp ODDO BHF SE identity to invite you to make a payment. We would like to inform you that these websites are not legitimate and have been created by fraudsters. We therefore urge you to be extremely vigilant.
If you have any doubts about the authenticity of any documents or solicitations, please do not hesitate to contact your usual contacts directly or to contact us at +33 1 44 51 85 00.
Bruno Cavalier
Chief Economist at ODDO BHF
Based on Chinese health data, quarantine measures appear to be effective in curbing the spread of the coronavirus, but they are hindering all or part of the country’s economic activity. This is typically a negative supply shock. At the macroeconomic level, this type of shock is quite rare. Most recessions are caused by negative demand shocks following a fall in the purchasing power of income or the value of assets. Over the decades, economic policy has made progress in supporting demand when necessary (fiscal stimulus, lowering rates). But what can be done to support supply?
Uncertainty, a propagator of shocks
According to WHO daily reports, which compile data from national health authorities1, the spread of the coronavirus epidemic is slowing in China, but in recent days it has tended to accelerate in the rest of the world (chart lhs). China's drastic quarantine measures have limited the spread of the coronavirus. This is a very positive development from the health perspective. But these measures have also had the consequence of halting or severely curbing economic activity. In China, anecdotal evidence, for example on real estate transactions or vehicle sales, looks alarming. China’s entire economy has not ground to a standstill but given the number of lost working days and the delays in restarting, it would not be surprising if the quarterly growth rate in China fell by around 2%-points in Q12. Globally, the direct impact would be a loss of around 0.5%-points (see our monthly report Economy & Rates dated of 14 February 2020: "The recovery in quarantine"). These estimates are, needless to say, highly provisional and would be turned upside down if other countries were forced to halt all or part of their production base. This risk must now be taken seriously into account as over the last few days, the number of people who have contracted the coronavirus has surged in South Korea, Iran and Italy. The quarantine of 50,000 people in Italy at the weekend spooked the markets more than the same measure on 50 million Chinese citizens since the start of the epidemic. On top of the supply shock comes a confidence shock, at a time when economic uncertainty was already high (chart rhs). We examine what this means for the behaviour of economic agents and for reaction of policymakers.
1 https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/
2 In 2019, Chinese real GDP was increasing by around 1.5% per quarter (6% over a year). A loss of around 2 points would mean stagnation or a slight contraction in real GDP in Q1 2020. The pace of year-on-year growth would slow from 6% to 4%.
Disclaimer:
Our news
Three British economists—Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton of the London Business School, and Elroy Dimson from Cambridge University—have embarked on a meticulous endeavour: they have traced 35 stock markets around the world as far back as possible to test a core theoretical question of investment. Are equities truly superior to all other asset classes over the long term?
Economic crises leave a legacy of high public debt. Expansion phases should be used as an opportunity by governments to reduce their debt and rebuild some headroom in their public finances. This is easier said than done. Let’s look at what happened after the last two major crises.
We must confess that we have a strategic "bias" in favor of the US market. The past 15 years proves us quite right. Since the end of the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis, Europe has outperformed for only 27 months, or just over 2 years. This structural outperformance of the US vs. Europe is mainly explained by a more robust EPS dynamic in the US.