Alert on fraudulent use of the ODDO BHF identity

We have noted a multiplication of fraud attempts in which the name ODDO BHF is likely to be used. This is particularly the case for Portuguese-language websites that usurp ODDO BHF SE identity to invite you to make a payment. We would like to inform you that these websites are not legitimate and have been created by fraudsters. We therefore urge you to be extremely vigilant.

If you have any doubts about the authenticity of any documents or solicitations, please do not hesitate to contact your usual contacts directly or to contact us at +33 1 44 51 85 00.

Three questions about rate cuts: why, when, by how much?

News

Economic Perspective 1/16/2024

Three questions about rate cuts: why, when, by how much?

ODDO BHF4 Minutes

Bruno Cavalier – Chief economist ODDO BHF 

 

 

KEY MESSAGES:

 

  • With the risk of inflation having largely receded, the rise in policy interest rates is now over.
  • In 2024, central banks will pivot towards monetary easing.
  • In a soft-landing scenario, the rate cut should be gradual. 
  • The markets are much more aggressive and could be disappointed.


The inflation shock that was so prominent in 2022 has faded everywhere in 2023. In the United States, the inflation rate ended the year at 3.4% year-on-year, while in the eurozone it fell even further to 2.9%. We’ve come a long way from inflation peaks at 10%! Although inflation has not yet returned to the 2% target, it is no longer far off (chart). Against this backdrop, central banks have stopped raising their policy rates in recent months: since July for the Fed, since September for the ECB.

2024 is poised to be the year of monetary policy easing. The financial markets eagerly await this pivot, anticipating that it could occur as early as the first quarter and that it will be very pronounced. However, markets are not omniscient. Neither in 2022 nor even at the start of 2023 did they contemplate policy rates rising that high. That is why all angles of the problem need to be looked at in detail. 

The first question is to understand why would the Fed or the ECB cut their policy rates. There have been many instances in the past where monetary policy was eased in response to a sudden shock. For example, to prevent the economy from sliding into recession or to mitigate its severity, or to prevent the markets from suffocating due to a lack of liquidity. The main objective of the central banks was to restore economic and monetary stability at all costs.

In 2024, the situation is different. This time, it is more about adjusting monetary policy in response to inflation converging towards its target. There are few cases in the past where this has happened. The only example that springs to mind is the situation in the United States in the mid-1990s. Faced with inflationary pressures, the Fed tightened its policy sharply in 1994, then began to reverse course in 1995. It was a complete success, with inflation easing without the economy falling into recession. In short, it was a textbook case of a soft landing, but one so rare that it was seen as an anomaly that would never happen again.

Are we currently experiencing a soft landing? There are many signs of it, particularly in the United States. In 2023, employment and income growth slowed without collapsing, unemployment remained low, household consumption and wealth increased, and inflation slowed down. In Europe, the situation is more at risk. Here too, the labour market has held up well, but consumption has stagnated, bank credit has dried up and the economy is flirting with a recession. If the Fed has reasons to ease its monetary policy, the ECB has even more incentive to do so. In any case, the monetary rules describing the "optimal" behaviour of central banks are starting to point towards easing in both regions. 

The second question is to determine the best time to start a rate cut cycle. Here again, a brief look at history is useful. In the face of a shock, it is customary to react very quickly, sometimes even at emergency meetings, as witnessed during the financial crisis in 2008 or at the start of the pandemic in 2020. In these episodes, where inflation was not a threat, but unemployment risked skyrocketing, there was no reason to hesitate.
In the present case, a degree of caution is called for. There is no major shock justifying an aggressive reaction. The decision is therefore more difficult. On the one hand, the tightening implemented in 2022 and 2023 has not been fully passed on to the real economy. On the other hand, at a time when new disruptions in maritime transit are occurring, which will delay deliveries and may cause shortages, it is not necessarily advisable to support demand. Delaying the rate cut would allow for continued pressure on inflation... but at the risk of maintaining a restrictive policy for too long. Conversely, easing would breathe life into business and credit... but at the risk of boosting inflation. In our view, this risk seems non-existent in Europe but cannot be completely ruled out in the United States. 

The final question concerns the extent of the rate cuts. It goes without saying that this question is inseparable from the previous two. In response to an economic shock or a financial crisis, it is advisable to cut rates very aggressively. As a reminder, the Fed cut rates by 475bp in 2001 (stock market crisis), 400bp in 2008 (financial crisis) and 150bp in Q1 2020 alone (pandemic). In contrast, during the soft landing of 1995, the cut was only 50bp. 
In its projections from last December, the Fed has a median scenario where key rates are cut only three times in 2024. At the ECB, officials have so far refused to even discuss rate cuts. In both regions, the markets are more aggressive, expecting the equivalent of six or seven rate cuts. Is this consistent with a central scenario of resilient economic growth and only a moderate rise in unemployment? It is doubtful. If the general pattern of a soft landing materialises, there is no reason why monetary easing should be very significant.

 


 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Disclaimer

This document has been prepared by ODDO BHF for information purposes only. It does not create any obligations on the part of ODDO BHF. The opinions expressed in this document correspond to the market expectations of ODDO BHF at the time of publication. They may change according to market conditions and ODDO BHF cannot be held contractually responsible for them. Any references to single stocks have been included for illustrative purposes only. Before investing in any asset class, it is strongly recommended that potential investors make detailed enquiries about the risks to which these asset classes are exposed, in particular the risk of capital loss. 

ODDO BHF 

12, boulevard de la Madeleine - 75440 Paris Cedex 09 France - Phone: 33(0)1 44 51 85 00 - Fax: 33(0)1 44 51 85 10 –

 www.oddo-bhf.com  ODDO BHF SCA, a limited partnership limited by shares with a capital of €70,000,000 - RCS 652 027 384 Paris –

approved as a credit institution by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (ACPR) and registered with ORIAS as an 

insurance broker under number 08046444. - www.oddo-bhf.com

Partager

Our news

AI: fad or margin effect? Market Outlook 2/14/2024

AI: fad or margin effect?

For the first time in 10 years, European companies are reporting results below consensus. The negative surprises are limited to just -2%, suggesting there's no immediate cause for alarm.

France-Germany, the sick couple of Europe Economic Perspective 2/14/2024

France-Germany, the sick couple of Europe

When a European country is in particularly bad shape, it is common for observers to refer to it as the "sick man of Europe", followed by the "new sick man of Europe", and so on. Every country has borne this infamous title at one time or another.

Long-term investors should not fear the US election Market Outlook 2/14/2024

Long-term investors should not fear the US election

The outcome of this year's US presidential election may have far-reaching consequences in many areas.